Comments on: Libertarian Defense Caucus Condems Recent Statements By Mike Gravel, Asks All Libertarians To Disavow His Actions, Calls On Libertarian Party To Expel Gravel From Party

By: sctxvhrjpj

sctxvhrjpj — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:05:59 +0000

By: E.D. Kain

E.D. Kain — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:52:35 +0000

Gravel should be ashamed, and Ayn, since when does being a libertarian mean you can’t take a strong defense position? Attacking first is not done out of aggression, but to prevent a worse conflict in the future–much like preventing crime, rather than merely catching the criminals after the fact.

By: Kevin Bjornson

Kevin Bjornson — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 03:10:50 +0000

I know I’m supposed to do a pivot, agreeing with your goals but pointing out your means would achieve the opposite. But I find I can’t agree with your embrace of a convicted/confessed terrorist and the harassment of his prosecutor’s innocent family.
This is a large step toward violent terrorism,
which is inconsistent with the non initiation of force principle. Or don’t “non-interventionists” bother with the NAP nowadays?

By: Ayn R. Key

Ayn R. Key — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:08:31 +0000

Wow, false-libertarian Gravel is being attacked by false-libertarian “Defense is when you attack first” Caucus for actually being libertarian on an issue.