Posted by: maverickwhig | May 18, 2009

Images of the week

Comments please.

Posted by: maverickwhig | May 13, 2009

Islamofascism and school children

Islamofascist organization, the Taliban has now apparently engaged in bioterrorism with a WMD.

Various international media are reporting on a serious incident from yesterday in northern Afghanistan. There are conflicting reports and numbers of injuries, but as many as 50 teenage girls have been admitted to a nearby hospital with various illnesses and ailments resulting from an apparent gassing.

“I am pretty sure whoever has done this is against education for girls, but I strongly ask the parents not to be discouraged by such brutal action and send their children to school,” said Noor Jahan, a ninth grader at Ura Jalili Girls’ High School.

In another room a mother sat beside her unconscious daughter’s bed, crying and rubbing the girl’s forehead. Around her lay several dazed and pale schoolmates.

“I was in a lesson when suddenly two classmates lost consciousness and collapsed,” said Nabila, a 21-year-old in one of the beds. Years of war and unrest mean children often finish school late in Afghanistan.

From Atlas Shrugs.

Posted by: maverickwhig | May 11, 2009

Image of the week

Comments please.

Posted by: maverickwhig | May 4, 2009

Image of the week

Comments please.

Posted by: maverickwhig | May 2, 2009

British patriot takes the words right out of my mouth

Posted by: maverickwhig | May 2, 2009

War on TERRORISM

Ok, I just wanted to clear something up from my last post, I do not advocate a war on Islam like some have claimed to or a war just on Islamofascism (I want a war on it, but not JUST them as the target). I believed George Bush when he dubbed it a War on Terrorism, it was a war or conflict against terrorist ideologies. All of these ideological groups have links with each other, it’s a network or a “ring” (I’ll explain that later) we are fighting against.

Here is a list of threats ordered from most important to least (from top to bottom):

Islamofascists
Narco-Terrorists
Pirates
Marxists/Leninists/Socialists/Maoists/Communists
Neo-Nazis/Neofascists/Christofascists
Violent Anarchists
Irish Republicans
Ulster Loyalists
Eco-Terrorists

Are we clear now? These groups are what I mean by “terrorism” when I say “War on Terrorism”.

Note:

This list can and most likely will be changed or modified from time to time as I or another administrator sees fit.

Posted by: maverickwhig | May 1, 2009

Islamofascism: defined

Islamofascism is four ideologies rolled into one:

Islamism- A government should be a totalitarian theocracy (Islamic in this case) essentially and that making laws, judgments, rules, and governmental standards all entirely based off solely the Qur’an is the best form of government.
Pan-Islamism- A government should as stated above, but it shouldn’t just be one or a few nation’s government, the whole world should be under one caliphate or world government ruled by a caliph (who would also be head of the Islamic church).
Islamic fundamentalism- The belief that Muslims have lost their way in the religion, and that people who are not Muslims are either destroying the world, evil, the devil in disguise, or some other religious claim and that they should be stopped. Also, they believe that Muslims are the only good people on the planet, and that all non-Muslims should either convert or die.
Jihadism/Qutbism/Khomeinism- The belief that all these stated goals should be acquired through jihad, mujahideen, or holy war. That you must actively take up arms against “infidels”, support the holy war in any way you can; financially, arm the terrorist groups, create political support in communities, governments, and establishments. This was the view of Sayyid Qutb, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. You could also draw links to Khomeini’s teachings, you see he believed in total Muslim unity and social solidarity (total white unity and social solidarity was a main ‘virtue’ of Hitler), as well as the export of Islamic revolution throughout the world: “Establishing the Islamic state world-wide belong to the great goals of the revolution.” Another name for these all these Qutb/Khomeini views would be Jihadism, this is essentially the Islamofascist form of bellism (fascist/Nazi philosophy of “war for the sake of war”, taken from the greek word for war “bellica”).

Islamofascism, is, essentially, a religious version of neofascism (any fascist thought after WWII). I do not want to insult Muslims when I use this term, I am trying to help them when I use this term. I want the real Muslims, the sane Muslim people that I know exist to start identifying these fascists in their communities so they can shun them, excommunicate them, and stop this political movement’s strangle hold on the religion so all may have peace again. Please, this is a message to all Muslims, only you can stop these monsters in the most important battlefield; the battlefield of your hearts and minds.

UPDATE:

I would also like to inform our Muslim libertarian friends that I honestly do not seek at all to define your religion as fascist in any way. I am merely stating that fascists have twisted your belief in the Qur’an in their rhetoric for their own gain of power. This can happen to any religion, you are not the only ones; if you don’t believe me please read this article on Christofascism.

“Establishing the Islamic state world-wide belong to the great goals of the revolution.”
Posted by: maverickwhig | April 28, 2009

Image of the week

blind-to-islamism

Comments please.

COUNTER TERRORISM BLOG

I suggest all members of the LDC and all who ideologically align themselves with us, and hell, even you non-interventionists (pro-appeasers) should read the link above.

It is a document outlining the farces, inconsistencies and errors made by pro-appeasers.

Now, before you comment below with remarks such as “neocon propaganda” “warmongering bullshit” “racist and bigoted analysis” ask yourselves – Am I absolutely right no matter what in this particular argument? Are those who disagree with me on this ALWAYS wrong concerning the subject? If you answer “no” to both, then you’re on your way to thinking for yourself. If you answered “yes” to both then you’re just another tool for some politically motivated asshole from some website like “Antiwar.com” who is marching you around the Internet and protests filled with name calling, propaganda, and lies for whatever they happen to think is a good idea. You are not thinking for yourself, and you practically just like the neocons you hate. No difference at all between neoconservatives, pro-appeasement ideologies, and “purist” libertarians.

“What makes a free thinker is not his beliefs, but the way in which he holds them. If he holds them because his elders told him they were true when he was young, or if he holds them because if he did not he would be unhappy, his thought is not free; but if he holds them because, after careful thought, he finds a balance in their favor, then his thought is free, however odd his conclusions may seem.”

—Bertrand Russell, “The Value of Free Thought”

“Dogma demands authority, rather than intelligent thought, as the source of opinion; it requires persecution of heretics and hostility to unbelievers; it asks of its disciples that they should inhibit natural kindness in favor of systematic hatred.”

—Bertrand Russell, quoted from Laird Wilcox, ed., “The Degeneration of Belief”

Remember, we are the libertarians who want to oppose and fight against totalitarians abroad who would create fascistic theocratic governments and bring terror here in the U.S., you guys are the “libertarians” who want to sit back and appease fascistic theocrats the likes of Adolf Hitler that would take over world governments and send terrorist cells in into our hometowns and cities in hopes of creating a gloabal totalitarian state ruled with an iron fist by a “Caliphate” or king – I guess in someway or some universe you think that is “libertarianism”.

Posted by: maverickwhig | March 26, 2009

To all libertarians who still support Gravel…

CRANK DAT TRAITOR!

Always good to have some laughs with a man who tries to keep a confesed terrorist from being punished for murder “in the name of the constitution”.

Even though the constitution says the rights and freedom of America’s citizens must be protected from being infringed by out side or domestic forces.

Yeah….

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories